WWE RAW Weekly Thread

**drave** · 04-20-2022, 09:16 AM

You see, if the belts were created 3.1445893 years ago, they would have had teams fighting over them better.

See, normally if you go one-on-one with another team, you have a 50/50 chance of winning. But 3.1445893 years ago wasn't normal! So at best, the other team now only has a 25% chance to win! Then you add in the crazy piss breaks and your chances of anyone caring drasctically go down.

See the 3 years for the belts, they got a 33 1/3 chance of winning, but I, I got a 66 and 2/3 chance of winning, because the other teams KNOWS they can't beat me and they aint even gonna try!

So Your Kingship,

you take their 33 1/3 chance, minus my 25% chance and you got an 8 1/3 chance of anyone caring. But then you take my 75% chance of winning, if we was to go one on one, and then add 66 2/3 per cents, I got 141 2/3 chance of winning dem belts tho.

See Norm, the numbers don't lie, and they spell disaster for your posts whenever you try.

04-20-2022, 09:16 AM	#11
drave Posts: 25,466	You see, if the belts were created 3.1445893 years ago, they would have had teams fighting over them better. See, normally if you go one-on-one with another team, you have a 50/50 chance of winning. But 3.1445893 years ago wasn't normal! So at best, the other team now only has a 25% chance to win! Then you add in the crazy piss breaks and your chances of anyone caring drasctically go down. See the 3 years for the belts, they got a 33 1/3 chance of winning, but I, I got a 66 and 2/3 chance of winning, because the other teams KNOWS they can't beat me and they aint even gonna try! So Your Kingship, you take their 33 1/3 chance, minus my 25% chance and you got an 8 1/3 chance of anyone caring. But then you take my 75% chance of winning, if we was to go one on one, and then add 66 2/3 per cents, I got 141 2/3 chance of winning dem belts tho. See Norm, the numbers don't lie, and they spell disaster for your posts whenever you try.