Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Nerfect
That’s the one. And I’m not trying to argue everyone for the sake of it or anything, but was this Rumble really that much flatter than Del Rio, or Sheamus, or the matches that all blur together. Remember when we got Triple H repeating from #30 and Roman spent most of the match taken out by The League of Nations? Are we really saying this was worse than that?
I’m caught between “The Rumble has sucked for years” and “this Rumble actually had some good stuff,” but that’s just how I feel about it. Has Shane EVER been in a Rumble? That is probably interesting to some people. You had AJ anchoring the first section of the match (from what I hear), before a big guy comes in and eliminates a bunch of people before getting eliminated themselves. You have a few cameo appearances and then the winner cleans up.
It just seems…fine by Rumble standards. Pretty textbook for a Rumble, really.
|
Not only has Shane competed in a Rumble, it was the
Greatest Royal Rumble.
Agreed you’re not trying to argue with anyone; it seems we’re all in agreement that the Rumble was “fine” - albeit you’re arguing from a position of “on paper”, when some of us have actually watched it (more fool us, right?).
It seems we depart along the following lines; I think it’d be great they actually did something interesting, you’re resigned to the fact that they won’t.
“Fine by Rumble standards” and “textbook for a Rumble” shouldn’t be where they are aiming.
02-02-2022, 04:33 AM
Threaded Mode