State Your Case: Why do you hate Triple H?

**Evil Vito** · 12-24-2013, 06:31 PM

I don't hate Triple H in his current role, I think he's in a great spot and he is so much better as a heel.

But from an in-ring perspective he's only had one match in like four years that I've actually enjoyed: vs. Taker at WM 28. Loved that match. I'll admit I haven't watched HHH/Taker from WM 27 again, but at the time I remember it being a tremendous letdown from Taker's previous WM efforts. I'm willing to give it another watch as it's possible I wasn't viewing it from an objective eye as that Mania in general was atrocious.

But his matches with Punk (both against and teaming with him) did nothing for me. His Nash PPV match was about what you'd expect from a Nash match in 2011. All 3 Lesnar matches bored me to tears. It's looking like HHH/Punk is in the workings for WM 30 and, if their 2011 match is any indication, it'll be largely forgettable on a show that should feature loads of better matches.

12-24-2013, 06:31 PM	#4
Evil Vito President of Freedonia Posts: 58,379	I don't hate Triple H in his current role, I think he's in a great spot and he is so much better as a heel. But from an in-ring perspective he's only had one match in like four years that I've actually enjoyed: vs. Taker at WM 28. Loved that match. I'll admit I haven't watched HHH/Taker from WM 27 again, but at the time I remember it being a tremendous letdown from Taker's previous WM efforts. I'm willing to give it another watch as it's possible I wasn't viewing it from an objective eye as that Mania in general was atrocious. But his matches with Punk (both against and teaming with him) did nothing for me. His Nash PPV match was about what you'd expect from a Nash match in 2011. All 3 Lesnar matches bored me to tears. It's looking like HHH/Punk is in the workings for WM 30 and, if their 2011 match is any indication, it'll be largely forgettable on a show that should feature loads of better matches.