Thread: WWE RAW Weekly Thread
View Single Post
Old 04-20-2022, 04:06 PM   #2312
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,516
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by drave View Post
You see, if the belts were created 3.1445893 years ago, they would have had teams fighting over them better.


See, normally if you go one-on-one with another team, you have a 50/50 chance of winning. But 3.1445893 years ago wasn't normal! So at best, the other team now only has a 25% chance to win! Then you add in the crazy piss breaks and your chances of anyone caring drasctically go down.


See the 3 years for the belts, they got a 33 1/3 chance of winning, but I, I got a 66 and 2/3 chance of winning, because the other teams KNOWS they can't beat me and they aint even gonna try!


So Your Kingship,


you take their 33 1/3 chance, minus my 25% chance and you got an 8 1/3 chance of anyone caring. But then you take my 75% chance of winning, if we was to go one on one, and then add 66 2/3 per cents, I got 141 2/3 chance of winning dem belts tho.



See Norm, the numbers don't lie, and they spell disaster for your posts whenever you try.
Going one-on-one in a tag match and having 50% chance of winning any given match is funny, but it’s sad when I can’t tell if it’s intentional or not. The rest was bleh. Of course Vito likes it. Prolly made him horny rn guys.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote