With the WWE "rebranding" Dean Ambrose's title as the WWE Championship

**Emperor Smeat** · 07-02-2016, 11:33 PM

If done correctly, the IC and US belt would have enough prestige and importance to cover the times when a certain brand doesn't have the WWE title as the top feud.

Would mean treating both belts more like the classic IC belt in the sense of being the real workhorse belts and legit stepping stones for stars to reach the next level. Problem is the WWE has shown plenty of times before if its not involving Cena or requires dedicate long term planning, they lose interest very quickly.

View Poll Results: Will the WWE go back to the vault or introduce a new title?
Reinstate the "big gold belt" with new lineage.	2	9.09%
Reinstate the "big gold belt" as the World Heavyweight Championship	2	9.09%
Introduce a new championship	4	18.18%
Fuck a new title, man! I want the champion to be on both the brands...you feeling' me, dawg?	14	63.64%
Voters: 22. You must log in or register to vote on this poll.

07-02-2016, 11:33 PM	#20
Emperor Smeat Former TPWW Royalty Posts: 66,653	If done correctly, the IC and US belt would have enough prestige and importance to cover the times when a certain brand doesn't have the WWE title as the top feud. Would mean treating both belts more like the classic IC belt in the sense of being the real workhorse belts and legit stepping stones for stars to reach the next level. Problem is the WWE has shown plenty of times before if its not involving Cena or requires dedicate long term planning, they lose interest very quickly.