Thread: Let's give Vince McMahon credit
View Single Post
Old 02-05-2021, 10:09 PM   #61
xrodmuc316
RoBOT Reigns
 
xrodmuc316's Avatar
 
Posts: 9,619
xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emperor Smeat View Post
Yeah, the Network is only considered a financial success because of that rich NBC deal WWE recently signed.

Without it, WWE would still be a few years away from just breaking even and mostly due to how long it took them just to reach a break even monthly level in subs and never growing it anywhere close to what they'd thought it would be by now.

Even in terms of just sub numbers, WWE Network pales in comparison to most services on their level and not just those that launched before or around the same time as the Network.
It's hard to remember specifically, but I believe it was Summerslam 2019 when they switched from the old Network to the bullshit one they have today.

It has gotten a little better as time has gone on Since then, but it still isn't anywhere near as good as it was on the old MLB platform.

NBC's Peacock however is very solid, rarely any bugs or streaming quality issues. I've not watched any live TV through it, but even if it 20% worse than their on demand shows, it will still be an upgrade over the turd performance WWE Network puts out today.
xrodmuc316 is offline   Reply With Quote