Thread: Question about the gold rush tournament...
View Single Post
Old 05-07-2005, 10:44 PM   #14
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,515
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by The CyNick
Thats what Ive been saying they should do.

I could see Edge winning the tourny, getting a shot at Batista on RAW or Vengeance and then losing. Then they do Batista-HHH 3 at Vengeance or maybe even Summerslam, and then after that match, Edge comes in and picks up the scraps and wins the title.
I'm thinking they're going to do a three-way match at Summerslam with Batista facing Triple H and Randy Orton, but that's just speculation on my part.

Anyway that would be a good time to have Edge run down and use his contract. That is the best way they can have him use it, IMO, and actually makes the Money in the Bank Ladder Match look like it's worth winning (I'm hoping they make it a semi-tradition of sort).
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote