[Heyman]

Originally Posted by The CyNick I dont know, I still think one of their problems is that they dont do the things that are predicatble and therefore best for business. Last year Eddie was the hottest guy they had on their payroll, they gave him the WWE title, gave him a win at Mania over the best worker in the company, and then jobbed him to JBL. That was about as unpredicatble as it gets, but it was probably a bad move. Orton should have got the push that Batista is currently getting, but they did the unpredictable thing and turned him face, and at the same time turned him into a bigger pussy then he was when he was a face. To top it off, they jobbed him a month after winning the title. Very unpredicatble, but very stupid. Cena may be over right now, but all it would take is a solid Pedigree in the middle of the ring, to quickly de-rail his overness. I just dont think he needs to be on RAW to reach his potential. As a matter of fact, I think the opposite is true, I think he'll reach higher heights if he stays on SD then if he were to go to HHH-land.

Hmmmm......

After reading your post, I must say that I never actually thought of it that way......and I think you're right for the most part.


I'm not sure if I agree with you on the Cena comment (about him being better off on SD).

I don't know what it is about Smackdown. If they had a few more 'big named' wrestlers on the show, then maybe Cena would look BETTER as champ.


For example - If Shawn Michaels and Chris Jericho were on Smackdown, then I'd argue that Cena would look "more important" as champ.


I don't know how else to explain it. Perhaps the ratings don't really say much, but Smackdown really looks like "the bush leagues" compared to RAW (due to the lack of "big names" I guess).

If Smackdown had more "big names" who were in the mid-card position, then perhaps Cena would look better as champ. Triple H or no Triple H.