Thread: Ratings Thread
View Single Post
Old 06-04-2025, 03:15 PM   #5621
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,523
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by xrodmuc316 View Post
Netflix tracking is weird. To be considered a live viewer, you have to stream every second live. So if you start at 8:01pm, you are not considered a live viewer. If you pause the broadcast and come back 1 minute later, you are not considered a live viewer. If you rewind 30 seconds to see something again, you are no longer considered a live viewer.

So all in all, who knows, but it is still WAY more than the 40,000 that watch on Dynamite Max
See, I didn’t even know that about counting live viewers. If that’s the case, I don’t count as a live viewer. I’m not watching Raw at 10am on a Tuesday. I don’t watch SmackDown live on Saturday either. I’ll jump in when the show is far along enough that I skip all the breaks. So I wouldn’t count as a live viewer for anything, and I am basically catching everything.

I am skeptical that even 40k watch Dynamite on MAX. I do love how some of the sickos out there try to imply that the WWE deal is so bad like if AEW went to Netflix it would be doing a larger audience. I also love the Meltzer maths on how bad the Netflix/WWE deal is, but somehow WBD/AEW is cooking.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote