Thread: "100,001" Replies (Wrestling Forum)
View Single Post
Old 07-20-2023, 01:29 AM   #68602
Savio
Spammy Certified
 
Savio's Avatar
 
Posts: 46,111
Savio makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Savio makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Savio makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Savio makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Savio makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Savio makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Savio makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Savio makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Savio makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Savio makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Savio makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Savio makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Savio makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
I am really curious why people (mostly UK based YouTube wrestling channels) hate Jinder's WWE reign so much as if WWE has never done anything more atrocious. This is a common theme that I have seen in literally every UK based popular YouTube channel.

Remember WWE is the same company that pushed babyface Roman. To win the Rumble and to beat Taker at Mania. How are those not seen as bad as Jinder winning the WWE title? Jinder was a heel and thus him winning in a heel way is pretty normal.

Does Jinder suck? Yes. But is he the worst WWE champion? Far from it. There were several things wrong about the Jinder reign but the amount of hate it receives while people are totally okay with stuff like Hell in a Cell matches ending in DQs is just ridiculous.

Honestly? I'll say I saw more people talk about Jinder's reign than Drew's first reign. Since we talk a lot about popularity and draws, doesn't Jinder being more talked about make him a better champion than Drew? Don't get me wrong Drew is amazing and I love his wrestling but his reign was mostly without any heat. Something Jinder had.

-Ripper
bad take
Savio is offline   Reply With Quote