Quote:
Originally Posted by Fignuts
This seems counter productive to me. We've spent years complaining that the wwe titles don't mean anything. Now we have one of the best reigns (lol) we've ever had, the title is more prestigious than its been in years, and you want to end with a guy you just admitted wouldn't be a serious long reigning champion, and would depreciate the value of belt enough for the guy you dont like to get it?
Help me out here, Jaw man.
|
The title is gonna get depreciated no matter what once it gets taken off of Reigns, because there is no one else on that level.
So it might as well be with the best story/moment possible. That just isn't Cody, sorry. If it is Cody, the same goes for him, he wouldn't be a super long reigning champ and the title would still be depreciated......
So go for the best story/moment. That is what will stick out in the anals of history. (Spelling mistake on purpose because it is funny)