Thread: All Elite Wrestling
View Single Post
Old 03-26-2022, 01:04 PM   #8542
XL
Feeling Oof-y
 
XL's Avatar
 
Posts: 17,151
XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Nerfect View Post
We have a very different perspective of what was going on. I was not interested in discussing the semantics of what a star is, which is an admittedly subjective term. I think it measures prominence. Austin Theory is a bigger star than Adam Page. Anyone regularly featured on WWE television is. Because they are prominent on a show that is consumed by more people domestically and worldwide.
The conversation spun out from a comment about AEW being able to make stars and WWE being incapable of doing so. With that pretense I think it’s important that we established what we were talking about when discussing what a star is. Besides, there was no discussion on the semantics; you set the definition that we were working with. Then offered examples (baring in mind you could have used anyone on WWE’s roster as an example) that didn’t meet the definition.
XL is offline   Reply With Quote