[XL]

Originally Posted by Mr. Nerfect How is any of that not a good faith discussion? I genuinely don’t think what you thought we were discussing is what I was trying to discuss and agreed with that. Austin Theory is a bigger star than just about anyone in AEW right now. Both in terms of how well known he is (due to WWE’s audience) and how featured he is on his programming (“Moose stars in Impact Wrestling”). I’d argue more people are tuning in to see what happens next with Austin Theory than are paying vivid attention to AEW. Being featured in the more popular show is going to be more culturally relevant than the entire universe of a tiny one revolving around you (like it does anyone down there anyway). I didn’t pivot from anything. I said it then and I’ll say it now: Austin Theory is a bigger star in wrestling than Adam Page.

Dude, I allowed you to define the terms we were discussing, had the discussion based on those terms, then when I pointed out how the example you gave didn’t meet the definition you gave you turned around and said that you’d believe me that I thought we were having a discussion based on the parameters you set. That’s so very gracious of you.

I “walked away” from that conversation rolling my eyes. I think everybody else managed to follow the conversation fine and took the words you used to mean the things you said. To suggest otherwise had more than a hint of “gas-lighting” and a stench of “bad faith”.