Thread: Ratings Thread
View Single Post
Old 03-01-2022, 08:45 PM   #3436
xrodmuc316
CodeBot Engaged...WOAAHH!
 
xrodmuc316's Avatar
 
Posts: 9,638
xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by #1-norm-fan View Post
Mmkay, apologies for praising AEW on their record buyrate and comparable numbers to WWE pre-network and making resident anti-AEW spaz #2 pop a blood vessel.

Trend more DOWNWARD, AEW. You retards.
You were not praising AEW, you were ignoring context to misrepresent the buyrate number in order to criticize WWE's 2013 business for no real reason.

Quote:
Originally Posted by #1-norm-fan View Post
205k PPV buys. Damn. Surpassing WWE’s pre-network PPV numbers.
Providing context is not being whatever the opposite of a Meltzersheep is, it is simply providing context that no, AEW is not surpassing WWE's 2013 PPV numbers.

As for the rest, I would point out that your reply is a much better example of popping a blood vessel, it is nothing to get that upset about.
xrodmuc316 is offline   Reply With Quote