Thread: "100,001" Replies (Wrestling Forum)
View Single Post
Old 02-21-2022, 04:33 PM   #63719
Fignuts
Hey Mister!
 
Fignuts's Avatar
 
Posts: 54,952
Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Fignuts makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jordan View Post
Honestly at this point I could almost care less about wrestlers "devaluing their legacy" by wrestling into old age. The footage of Taker's prime or Golbergs or whoever's is there to watch, it doesn't change because they are old now and suck when they wrestle. Just them cutting promo's and walking to the ring for the match seems to be "worth it" for the majority of fans and that's probably the only thing that should matter.
I think the complaints are less about legacy, and more about not wanting to see old men sloppily fumble around the ring, when they have young, capable athletes that can go.

Obviously spectacle is a big part of wrestling, but at some point, if the wrestling itself is bad enough, the spectacle can't make up for it.
Fignuts is offline   Reply With Quote