Thread: Ratings Thread
View Single Post
Old 12-09-2021, 03:34 PM   #2931
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,523
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Also, can anyone dispute my assertion that it is possible NXT 2.0 does way better than perceived to when you factor in Peacock numbers? Serious question. For all I know, it doesn’t even have a Network presence anymore. But if it does, who is to say that those numbers don’t see it overtake Dynamite in terms of audience? What indicators do we have there?

The drop in audience since the move from black and gold to the 2.0 aesthetic and direction is obviously not preferred. I mean, you’d want to stay steady, maybe even see an increase. But radical changes like that are going to generate attention and then likely cause a disconnect between the previous audience and a new one. Do we know the timeframe placed on this to solidify its own following?

It’s fun to speculate. Believe me, I have so much fun with the AEW numbers every week. But does anyone actually have a clue how well NXT 2.0 does overall, and what its actual value to NBC Universal is?
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote