View Single Post
Old 12-06-2021, 02:58 PM   #287
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,517
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by #1-norm-fan View Post
And yes, when you accuse everyone of unnecessarily dog piling on you because “I’m just speaking the truth and people can’t handle it!” you’re painting yourself as a victim of the mob. That’s not even an insult. I’d think you should be the first to admit that. Lol

Though given that horrible understanding of what I’m telling you by pointing out this analogy, I don’t expect that to register either.
There’s absolutely nothing wrong with being a victim, but dog-piling describes an act, not a reaction. Pointing out that you, screech, Vito (from memory) and presumably Rey and Dave have technically dog-piled on me (even XL took a crack) isn’t the same thing as feeling victimized by it. Do you deny that is actually what happened? You even used the phrase earlier. But you then have a go at me for being a “poor boy.” So which is it? Does dog-piling on someone make them a victim by your own definition, or did it never happen? And who is arguing against reality?

My comment about The Rock was intended to be flippant. Whether or not it was interpreted that way could be tone, miscommunication or, yeah dude, down to the reader’s error or biases.

Let me explain: Only in the IWC would you find people complaining about The Rock’s return.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote