Thread: Ratings Thread
View Single Post
Old 01-21-2021, 08:51 PM   #2516
xrodmuc316
CodeBot Engaged...WOAAHH!
 
xrodmuc316's Avatar
 
Posts: 9,777
xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slik View Post
Actually what people say is that WWE's largest viewing demo is 50+...which it is, there's literally a chart you are quoting...
Yeah, and like I already said, you yourself make that claim based on the chart, but completely ignore Raw killing Dynamite in the 18-34 demo.

So even if the biggest segment is 50 plus, so what? It doesn't change the fact that they more than double Dynamite in the young people demo, does it?

So why are you so biased every week posting those rating charts, when they disprove your bias?

I said it last week, 18-34 demo
Raw - .35
AEW - .15

So even if every WWE fan over 50 dies tomorrow, guess what, Raw would still beat Dynamite, so fuck your rating chart.
xrodmuc316 is offline   Reply With Quote