Quote:
Originally Posted by Emperor Smeat
What's with you thinking everything I talk about wrestling comes from or is influenced by Meltzer.
That problem with Bayley is what Steph stated on SD last night as the reason for making the upcoming Battle Royal a three-brand match instead of just focusing on SD.
WWE's main roster women's division being a mess comes from actually watching these shows the past few months and seeing WWE wasting a golden opportunity to properly build up others lower on the ladder and improve the quality of their RAW and SD divisions.
AEW Women's division is just as poorly booked because of a mix of injuries and them not getting enough quality tv time to develop into a strong division after all these months.
|
Because you assume his default internet position, which is not only unoriginal, but it's actually unfounded. I don't have to watch to know that the stories on SmackDown have been Mandy Rose and Sonya Deville as well as Alexa Bliss & Nikki Cross vs. Sasha Banks & Bayley. It's a two hour show. Those are functional, if boring and shitty, stories right there. It's not a "mess." It's actually quite tidy. The messiest thing has been changing Lacey Evans' gimmick back and forth. But that's whatever, because she's the shits.
I don't know what you expect a Women's Division on a WWE show to be? How many women characters should they focus on? 16? 32? They need a new challenger now so they're setting up a new challenger. It's in the laziest way possible, but it makes "sense" strictly speaking. Bayley has been fucking around everywhere so Stephanie, who seems to have an issue with these ladies, is going to announce open season on her. How is that messy? You have a few women who matter on SmackDown, and it looks like they might be losing Sasha, so they're going to get a new one in. Big whoop.
To complain that there aren't a billion women doing round robin matches each week is pretty markish. And what would you scrap in favor of these Iron Woman matches to create an unlimited batch of women stars?