Thread: Ratings Thread
View Single Post
Old 07-23-2020, 06:01 AM   #1784
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,517
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slik View Post
If I was USA Network and were paying 44 million a year for NXT and 230 million a year for RAW and it was doing just barely double what NXT does, I'd be thinking about seeing if I could re-negotiate out of my current deal to pay a better price for RAW
That double is so much more exposure. I hear a bunch of AEW drones talk about how TNT is paying chips for Dynamite and it reaches 700k people. It's a much, much, much wider net to cast with 1.6 million or whatever.

If the WWE got good somehow, and every fan told three people about how good WWE is and just 10% of them were converted, that is an additional 480k fans. If AEW did the same thing, you still wouldn't get over the 1 million mark.

When you get to that much exposure, it's just unparalleled, which is what you're paying for if you are an advertiser. People keep the same ratio when you're talking about a show with the audience of a Dynamite versus one wit the scope of Raw's.

And 0.41 is basically twice what AEW does most weeks, so there's fucking that.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote