Thread: Ratings Thread
View Single Post
Old 07-13-2020, 01:10 AM   #1715
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,504
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emperor Smeat View Post
Fine. I'm done bother talking about ratings for shows anymore since a bunch of twats here has made it a lot less fun or enjoyable to discuss in recent times.

You or anyone else want to stick with your antics in this thread, then be my guest since I no longer give a shit anymore.
Stop being such a sook. You said something stupid. 7th and 24th were separated by 102k viewers this week. A lot of them probably people advertisers want nothing to do with, since wrestling fans are far from trend-setters, and you played it up like a big deal.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigCrippyZ View Post
I'm sorry, but this is a bunch of nonsense and it seems like you don't know the realities of what these numbers mean for revenues.

In today's market, that much difference in the key 18-49 demo, especially vs another program with a remotely similarly sized overall audience, regularly results in advertisers paying almost double or sometimes more for a spot. That means more $ for the broadcaster and more security (and sometimes $) for that program's producer.

Is that always smart for the advertiser? Maybe. Maybe not. The reality is however that they still regularly do it.
I'm sorry, but this is a bunch of nonsense and it seems like you don't know the realities of what these numbers mean for revenues.

A lot of advertisers have gone digital, since cable is a dying medium. It's no longer the best way to reach people in these demographics. They also get a lot more information than a fucking chart from Showbuzz. They're interested in disposable income, spending habits and whether or not the people in that demo are going to fit their brand image.

Gertner went through the sponsors AEW is attracting. Sounds like a old, fat, white audience. Super-attractive to advertisers and sponsors, right? If you want to compare this to NXT, you've got a worldwide audience (far more established than AEW) and a PG rating, which makes them a lot more accessible. Mountain Dew sponsored the show last week, apparently, so they would have had a commercial broadcast all around the world that lives in perpetuity. Plus, NXT isn't taking anywhere near as much of that from USA's mouths as AEW is from TNT.

By the way, AEW has lost 59% of their fans in that demo since they started.

Stop trying, Cripz. This promotion keeps shooting itself in the foot and the honeymoon is over. More and more people are realizing that those who were saying "Whoa-oh" from the start were right, and you just can't deal with it because you're a zealot who is so obsessed with hating anything and everything WWE that anything else was going to be "such good shit" and your ability to reason on the subject was blocked. You hitched your wagon to the wrong horse and wrestling is worse off because people kept kissing vanity promotion ass.

Prove me fucking wrong.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote