Thread: Ratings Thread
View Single Post
Old 07-12-2020, 09:37 PM   #1708
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,473
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emperor Smeat View Post
Only problem with your math is a 0.28 vs 0.20 is actually higher than a 80k difference since a tenth of a ratings point doesn't equal 10k viewers. Same for a 1.0 in overall ratings doesn't equal 1 million viewers nor has that been the case for a long time.

Just counting the live numbers since that is what advertisers care about more, AEW had a 100k advantage this week but half of all their viewers were in that key demo area. Meanwhile only around a third of all NXT viewers were in that same demo area. So while AEW had around 45k less total viewers, they would still be more appealing to advertisers compared to NXT since their audience share in that key demo is much higher.
NXT's average in the demo was 262k. AEW's was 364k. So it wasn't ~80k. It was ~100k.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote