View Single Post
Old 06-17-2020, 12:40 AM   #2656
xrodmuc316
CodeBot Engaged...WOAAHH!
 
xrodmuc316's Avatar
 
Posts: 9,777
xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Guycott View Post
How about this: Billy Gunn is bigger than you would assume he is in both height and mass, be it enhanced or not. The point was a viable measuring stick on how much of a "monster" Luchasaurus actually is in relation to the talent on the roster, not a debate in semantics on the definition of "huge".
Which was my point, the narrative that Luchasaurus is so huge is bullshit, he isnt. He's billed at 6'5" 270lbs. Billy Gunn at 56 is roughly the exact same size and never worked a "big man" gimmick.

Both Rock and Triple H are in the same range, not to mention both who were more muscular, and neither of them worked the "big man" gimmick either.

Luchasauras only looks big wrestling against 5'8" guys and teaming with 5'5" and 5'2" 125 pounders. But it's typical wrestling smoke and mirrors, he is no more huge then he is a real dinosaur.I

Then when he squares up against a Jake Hager and is visibly smaller, it instantly exposes him as not really that big.
xrodmuc316 is offline   Reply With Quote