View Single Post
Old 06-16-2020, 12:21 AM   #2630
xrodmuc316
CodeBot Engaged...WOAAHH!
 
xrodmuc316's Avatar
 
Posts: 9,634
xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by #1-wwf-fan View Post
Again, this is a weird fucking thing to harp on them for being “same old shit” on. They aren’t allowed to get talent from WWE because that makes them like TNA. They aren’t allowed to get talent from the indies because that makes them like ROH. Since you can’t seem to answer me when I ask what the other option is I assume you expect them to be the first company to create their own wrestlers in a laboratory.
I'm not harping on it. All I said was they lost a third of the audience who tuned in to see something different, but then just saw more of what probably made them stop watching Impact or ROH 10 years ago. It is also part WWE in look, because they have a real budget.

I said a lot of stuff, people replying to THIS one point is the only reason I have addressed it further. For the record, of course they should sign former WWE guys, of course they should find Indy guys and bring them in.

I'm still watching every week, I'm not part of the 1/3rd of the audience they lost. That is because as I said originally, wrestling is still better than pretty much anything else on tv. AEW is much more good than bad, I enjoy it.

I guess best I can say is read the entire post as a whole, don't pick out one single point.
xrodmuc316 is offline   Reply With Quote