View Single Post
Old 02-24-2020, 05:43 PM   #20
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,513
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guru Dave View Post
From what I understand, you're in favor of delaying it even further in order to get your jollies. Cena hasn't wrestled a proper match in a while and Goldberg is an absolute train wreck unless it's a squash.

While I am not aware of your stance on Wyatt or his new gimmick, the company has put a lot of stock in his presentation over the past year. It'd be a shame for his arc to end abruptly prior to WrestleMania. As a fan, I am concerned about good storytelling rather than what would look better as a marquee match for ESPN+ or Amazon Prime. I find your priorities amusing.
It wouldn’t be a long match for exactly those reasons. Cena shouldn’t be in anything long, nor should Goldberg. It’s a perfect fit. And if I were trying to make money for the company that has the primary goal of making money, I would definitely go with the option that makes more money and build those other people up to make more money later (if they can). Yes, how very amusing.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote