Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Bad News Gertner
Lol what?
|
When I heard Corny answer your question it was funny b/c I thought "I know of a guy on a forum named Gertner" and it turned out to be you. Maybe I should try my luck and send in a question.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jordan X
That was awesome, shitty commentary though. Funny how you think of old wrestling as slow and methodical but it seems like this match is based more off high spots and they move faster than guys in PWG. Those slams looked tough as hell too, strong hard ring obviously. Those piledrivers looked so legit.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Bad News Gertner
Some of the stuff from that era is actually pretty good. It holds up better than alot of 70's WWWF
|
Not surprising! '70S WWWF didn't seem to be heavy on classic matches.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by #1-wwf-fan
Yeah, I think that actually kinda answers the question. It has less to do with tenure and more to do with the fact that... he's the fucking Undertaker. He comes off like a guy who commands respect. Most of the guys today, including the ones you mentioned, come off like guys who command video game tournaments before the show.
|
None of those guys come close to being the attraction Taker is.