View Single Post
Old 10-29-2017, 07:22 PM   #37437
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,517
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emperor Smeat View Post
Apparently the Observer's Dave Meltzer spent part of yesterday contacting people he knows in the WWE that normally defend all of Vince's booking decisions to get an idea why Kane squashed Balor on RAW.

Turns out nobody had any good idea why it was done and likely just another spontaneous decision by Vince who felt like having a Kane squash match and picked Balor only because he could.
Yeah, probably just a Vince whim. In his mind it may have made Kane look better than it made Balor look worse. Part of me thinks that maybe the "too sweet" recognition at TLC didn't help.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote