Quote:
Originally Posted by #1-wwf-fan
That was the storyline, yes.
There's a big difference between him coming back to cost Lesnar a title match after Lesnar and Heyman heeled it up and antagonized him for a year and a half and him coming back to cost Reigns a match simply because he eliminated him from the rumble fair and square. One is justified and the other would be weird and petty.
|
Weird and petty like how undertaker went after maven when he elimated him from the rumble? Reigns stopped him from getting his last chance at the title. That's enough reason for taker with the way he's always been booked.