Thread: MLB Thread
View Single Post
Old 12-24-2016, 12:42 PM   #9734
Droford
 
Posts: 52,478
Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Damian Rey 2.0 View Post
Based on what exactly? And age isn't the argument. The claim waa Schoop was better.

Kipnis-275/343/469, +4 drs, 4.1 WAR

Schoop-267/298/454, -1 drs, 2.1 WAR

Kipnis was literally twice as good lol. Kipnis was a better hitter, fielder, and base runner. Or, in other words, Kipnis is better at baseball.

Even in his first full season 5 years ago, Kipnis was twice as good. I'm curious what part of your ass you're trying to argue out of here.
Kipnis' numbers are probably as good as he gets whereas Schoops are from his first full season at age 24. I guarantee you Schoop will be better than Kipnis next year which is why I say he's better than Kipnis
Droford is offline