Thread: "100,001" Replies (Wrestling Forum)
View Single Post
Old 08-27-2016, 08:38 AM   #28220
Rammsteinmad
TPWW's #3 Peep
 
Rammsteinmad's Avatar
 
Posts: 20,903
Rammsteinmad makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Rammsteinmad makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Rammsteinmad makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Rammsteinmad makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Rammsteinmad makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Rammsteinmad makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Rammsteinmad makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Rammsteinmad makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Rammsteinmad makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Rammsteinmad makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Rammsteinmad makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Rammsteinmad makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Rammsteinmad makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noid View Post
When planning out how WrestleMania could go in my head, I really think the WWE could do two WrestleManias. I mean, when you consider that you'll have all these part-timers returning, you could space them out between the two brands and really give everything some breathing room.

I mean, Shane and Triple H will both probably wrestle. If The Undertaker wants to, he'll have a slot too. Then there's Brock. Cena. Orton. Rock. It'll all work out. Would doing two amazing 4-hour shows be more beneficial than doing one 7-hour one?
I'd say no, simply coz Wrestlemania is "the big one" with over 30 years of history, and just wouldn't be right being "the big two". Of course, they could solve the problem if guys like Triple H and Undertaker would finally fuck off and stop stealing the spotlight.
Rammsteinmad is offline   Reply With Quote