Thread: Videogame News Thread
View Single Post
Old 05-19-2016, 05:33 PM   #10944
drave
 
drave's Avatar
 
Posts: 25,464
drave makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)drave makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)drave makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)drave makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)drave makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)drave makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)drave makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)drave makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)drave makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)drave makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)drave makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)drave makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)drave makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kalyx triaD View Post
The first two Arkham games still look fabulous. There was no reason to 'remaster'.

Mid to late generation 360/PS3 games are virtually on par with at least year 1 and 2 current gen games.

To attempt to touch them up is now a risk to their aesthetics and fidelity. As said; wtf.

No. It should never be a problem to "remaster" a game with newer technology. Just people at the helm not knowing wtf they are doing.
drave is offline   Reply With Quote