Quote:
Originally Posted by The CyNick
You're losing it dude and grasping at straws now.
"Some people dont like money"
Classic stuff you probably read from one of the Newsletters. Of course WWE doesnt want to make money. Of course WWE hasnt already built the industry leader and a billion dollar + business. But no, you and the IWC know how to book better and you think WWE doesn't like money. Jokes.
You still haven't illustrated how Sting winning at Mania would lead to more Network subs long term. I laid out how HHH helps, please hit the ball back over the fence so I can lay another winner down the line.
|
Haha, nah, you're the one getting desperate with the IWC slander stuff and talking up your own non-argument.
How does Sting winning translate to money/more Network subs?
* A big draw of the Network is being able to re-live the PPVs of yesteryear. Sting was a huge part of the story WCW told over its entire PPV history. If you want to get people to take more of a bite of the WWE Network, and stay hooked on it for longer, promoting WCW is a freakin' great idea.
CONVERSELY: Triple H beating Sting implies that WWE was always better, so those WWE PPVs you've joined us watching are the only things that matter.
* The plan is clearly for Sting to wrestle more than one PPV match, as it always probably should have been. This is now evident and not debatable as Sting is booked for Night of Champions. He's going into the PPV with zero momentum and no one thinking he's really got a chance, and worse, many not caring since he lost his last clusterfuck.
CONVERSELY: If Sting had beaten Triple H, he'd be 1-0 in the WWE, with that win being over a former 13-time World Champion that beat Brock Lesnar at WrestleMania. The title might actually be in jeopardy. This anticipation could lead to more people signing up to the Network, especially if they're...
* An older WCW fan who stopped watching at the death of the Attitude era. I think it's a bit of a fool's errand to go and try recruiting these people back, but Sting is a well-known commodity that might make people go "Hang on, I might check this out..." With a 0-1 record, he not only provides a sad reminder that his era is gone, but he also makes a completely nonsensical choice as a title challenger.
CONVERSELY: If Sting had won the match, he'd be 1-0 in the WWE, with that win being over a former 13-time World Champion that beat Brock Lesnar at WrestleMania. The title might actually be in jeopardy. This anticipation could lead to more people signing up to the Network...you get it...
It's amazing you don't get how Sting losing every match is pissing away money. Oh well. I don't think it's one of those things you can explain to people if they don't get it.