lol Not even trying to be mean. I'm genuinely trying to figure out what the fuck is going on here.
Like... he started by stating that Rollins technically had to be on his feet for a cash-in.
Then he argued Vito's point by saying the rule was voided because he cashed in on a match that was already happening.
Now that last post just seems to be him saying it's not really a rule that has been followed in the first place. Almost like he's needlessly correcting himself now.
... This page of Droford posts is confusing as shit right now.
|