View Single Post
Old 11-08-2012, 09:39 PM   #37188
#1-norm-fan
Resident drug enabler
 
#1-norm-fan's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,473
#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Sure it's a fair assessment. I simply asked if you think it would be as big of a deal. It would surely affect interest if the Super Bowl was taped in advance and spoilers were available beforehand and you knew you weren't gonna get to experience it live as it happened. If people who aren't interested in football are gonna watch it anyway, so what? That's one small portion. You're right that WWE doesn't have that demographic. So what's it matter? It would definitely put a dent in interest for the majority of the people who would normally want to watch in either situation.
#1-norm-fan is offline