11-27-2011, 02:05 AM
|
#614
|
Angel Headed Hipster
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RoXer
No, I am good with LMGs.
Maybe I just shouldn't be using rapid fire. I find it ridiculous that I fire 10 shots with rapid fire into someone and I get either a bunch of hit markers or don't get anything as the other guy has already killed me.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RoXer
Yeah, obviously LMGs are better suited for defense. But even on offense, they should prove lethal. I should not die to any enemy using an assault rifle when I only get two hit markers.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RoXer
In real life, a gun is a gun. If you get shot, you get shot. Fuck anything about fire rate or damage or mobility or any of that shit. You can complain to God when you're dead that your death is bullshit because your gun had a higher fire rate. I get that.
But in Call-of-Duty-Land, they've set it up so that (not including sniper rifles) the MK14 (the single shot assault rifle) and M60 are the guns that deal the biggest damage. You should rarely get more than 1 hit marker with those guns. If I get the same amount of hit markers with the M60 as I would with any other LMG, then what's the point? Even if I add rapid fire, which would make the M60 the deadliest gun available, I still get the same amount of hit markers if I die from someone using an assault rifle.
|
Seriously. You're just bad with them.
|
|
|