|
Kinda thinking the WWE should do away with most of their title belts. The point of a wrestling belt is to elevate the wrestler that wears it. Is that really the case with the US, Diva, Tag-team, or WHC?
No one cares about the divas so why have a belt? No one cares/they don't have a tag division to speak of so why bother with a belt? Plus it looks horrid. The US title has been on DB for awhile now and what good has it done him. Use the IC title on both shows and get rid of the US belt, it was cute in 2003 when Eddie had it, its doesn't mean anything now. Even the WHC doesn't mean half what the WWE title does. That WHC reign for Jack Swagger really elevated his career. Having two 'world titles' de-values both of them.
Having less titles makes winning them that more impressive and would once again help elevate the wrestlers that win them. WWE title and IC title, thats all they need. And if tag wrestling is brought back from the dead, then bring the belts back. That is all.
edit: Also just do away with womens wrestling, no one cares about them wrestling, keep them around for eye candy, but keep them out of the ring.
|