Matter fact, fuck it:
- All this shit about how I don't like Perks because I'm not good at it? Fuck off. I've been managing buffers since before some of you bought your own videogames. That I wouldn't be able to manage special buffers in an FPS is absurd, but for reason I couldn't demonstrate here without a time machine. That also records video. Do not make this about my skill. It's off subject and it's false as fuck anyway.
- Perks makes a perfectly fine shooting game like MW2 more tactical the way Soulcalibur 4's Special Vs. Mode is more tactical with buffer items. In that it forces you to use something lest you fall victim to it when others use it. This isn't tactics, it's an exploitation arms race. Yeah, Special Mode on Soulcalibur sucks ass too.
- It's telling that with a choice to play the game with or without Perks, where the latter has you relying on your own instincts/planning/execution - you guys choose buffers that increase chance of success. It falls in line with the Playing To Win philosophy - coined by Street Fighter champ David Sirlin - who advocates the use of exploits and glitches to win. And an exploit is an exploit whether it's an official feature or not.
This shit would, and maybe should, lead to me facing off with some of you chaps on both terms. But to what end? I mean... I've played CoD4 with Perks and fared well. I 'got it', I just didn't agree with the design philosophy. I got shit for it back then from you guys and here we are again.
So if your conclusion is "Kalyx sucks at MW2", prove it. Betting you can't, which would lead to me being called a game/FPS-freak/nerd. And if I lose, in either style of play, I'd get shit. But really, don't say I suck without watching me play or playing me. Get that shit outta here.
|