Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Plus a ratings audit is very much a real thing. Just not in the way you're thinking or misrepresenting it. Any negotiations dealing with WWE's TV rights will require performance and presentation of at least 2 audits, (one provided by WWE and one by the negotiating network or an independent auditor) of which the audits will include among many other things, WWE's TV ratings data compared to ALL other networks/shows. The Nielsen ratings data provided by WWE in their audit will be compared to the Nielsen ratings data gathered by the network or independent auditor to see if there's any falsifications or mistakes in WWE's presentation of the Nielsen data. This ratings data will then be reconciled or accepted and used to determine a valuation of WWE's TV rights. |
Quote:
|
But what was their net gain? Batman v Superman was a high revenue movie, but nearly flopped due to actual profit.
Is WWE making their best profit? Isn't profit, not revenue, most important? |
Feel like CyNick is the Donald Trump of the boards. He's got intelligence, the best intelligence, he has experience, wonderful experience, but he doesn't really show any tangible data or facts.
He says things factually, but nothing is presented to back it up. |
Quote:
The only way the WWE having ratings that are nearly double the network's average wouldn't be a positive to their ability to get a good rights deal would be if the network couldn't sell and space during the show. As I mentioned, this is why WWE was far worse off in the Attitude Era, even though the ratings were double or more what they are today. As has been documented from recent up fronts, WWE programming has generated a long list of new A list sponsors, which makes them even more valuable. If you want to dispute that, you've got an uphill battle. But I appreciate your gumption. |
Quote:
|
alternative facts
|
lol CyNick's day has been made by being compared with the Donald.
|
Quote:
The problem is you will never know what the profitability of the company would have been without The Network. I believe it would have been much lower than it is today, but that's making an assumption that WWEs PPV business was in decline. But admittedly is a debatable point. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
He's got facts, but they're secret facts. You cant know them, but believe him, theyre good facts.
|
Quote:
#1fan will get that reference... No wait, he won't. Too bad. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
#1fan is going to go home and rest before making any speeches. Low energy. Let's keep counting those votes!!
|
Quote:
Either way... swing and a miss, Cynick. Swing and a miss. |
CyNick is the Vince McMahon to my PewDiePie.
|
Quote:
|
I actually missed the part where CyNick was a Trump supporter until it was brought up by Dale in this thread. lol Amazing.
|
Quote:
And it still didn't answer my question. Are they a profitable company or are they losing money? |
Quote:
Maybe if you had my insight and intelligence you would be able to hold court like I can. |
Quote:
They transformed from being PPV dependent to moving into the VOD space. That was a major transformation which retired a lot of investment. It started paying off in 2015, and grew even more in 2016. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Sometimes it's a simple, generic insult to try to save face and avoid acknowledging another blatant strawman...
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Low Energy, sad.
|
Lol. Give CyNick a chance to prove his point and he tells you to look it up. Wonderful.
|
His point is right there to see. You can't not see it. It's huge. HUGE. Other people have points but they're so insignificant compared to his point. He talked to Google the other day and Google was like "CyNick. That's such a huge point you have. How do you do it, even?" #SomethingAboutChina
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Give a man a fish, you've fed him for a day. Teach a man to fish and you've fed him for life. Consider yourself fed for life. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:02 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®