![]() |
|
Nobody at WWE needs to take acting lessons. They all need to stop taking acting lessons. The reason their acting is so poor is because they have taken acting lessons and are trying to act rather than just be theirself. If your character is not yourself then you are in trouble, ask Stone Cold Steve Austin.
-Cheers Taker it Easy |
no dear, that's bollocks
|
Quote:
I hope their feud starts by Punk crashing a Fozzy gig and beating up Jericho. |
Quote:
|
If I was a mod, the next person who posts aTaker thread would be deleted.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
WWE is like a super high class carnival. They are bookers and pushers, doing close to anything to sell a show. Thats why WWE is often late or lack luster in terms of jumping on board with things. Think about how sad it is that WWE denies part of itself... imagine denying you are a human or a male or a female or a being. They deny in ways that they are a wrestling company... :rant: |
SHOTS FIRED!
Maryyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyse P.O.T.D. http://c0014159.r32.cf1.rackcdn.com/x2_ab76886 |
WHORE
|
she's got the mr socko/cobra/jeff hardy arm band thing going on there
|
Quote:
Maybe it's just me, but his new theme doesn't have any power behind it for a guy like Barrett. His previous theme just blasted power at you from the beginning, and the song was basically saying that Barrett was unstoppable and was going to kill you. His new theme starts off pretty weak and it just sounds out of place when I think of the song and Barrett. Maybe if the guitars were a bit heavier, then it might suit Barrett more. Don't get me wrong, it's a good song, but not a good song to associate Wade Barrett with. To me, it would suit someone more like Trent Barreta than Wade Barrett. |
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/JrLEGpRtO0s" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
:heart: |
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/tHMBuiPvJmc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Alex Riley is too busy jobbing to shoot a segment with Santino. |
So I've just bought Edge's DVD (A Decade of Decadence) for £6.99. Pretty sweet. :cool:
|
Quote:
|
Also, I just read that they're thinking of doing the MITB match at this year's WrestleMania with all former World champions...
|
|
Quote:
|
Yeah. Possibly Del Rio
|
no Nash?
lol, he would make the MITB match awesome |
It's just a thought, but wouldn't it be better and easier for people who want to talk about The Undertaker, if all the Undertaker threads were merged into one big "Undertaker Thread"?
There's nine threads on The Undertaker right now in the wrestling forum and it just seems a bit ridiculous. :-\ |
I'll do it if another one pops up.
Iop thinks he's hilarious tho and bumped like 5 old Undertaker threads earlier today, but I deleted his posts. |
Ahh, they're bumped. I thought all of them were new.
I guess I should have checked them out first. |
Quote:
|
For the record, we currently have 9 Undertaker threads open. If I see any more I'm going to merge them all.
|
I have also just read the last few posts here and see Juan is on board with my thinking also.
|
Go ahead man. The joke is over with.
|
|
That Santino show wasn't as funny as I'd thought/hoped it would be. :(
|
Quote:
|
|
Whoa, I don't know what to say. Is that a tranny?
|
|
Ryan Clark reports:
VIDEOS: Five New WWE YouTube.com Shows Now, tell me what is wrong with that report. |
He's embedded the same video twice?
|
Calling it two different things, and then saying that five new shows debuted.
|
:rofl::rofl::rofl:
|
It was funny all by itself, but I was expecting a comment either about "... it was done by Ryan Clark" or "the one had Daniel Bryan in it", since shitting on him as of late is the Cartoon Network thing to do around here.
|
Quote:
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:49 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin®