Wolverine: 5/10

Fast and Furious 7.5/10

Wolverine 4.5/10

Star Trek 8.5/10
JCVD 7.5/10

JCVD?

Jean Claude Van Dam

lol, jeritron is a trekkie.

JCVD was pretty good.
I've never liked Star Trek in my life but I'm not going to deny a great movie.

TREKKIE!

Indiana Jones: Temple of Doom - 10/10
Speed - 8/10
Under Siege 4/10

Star Trek - 9/10

Spiderman 3 - 4/10

The Devil's Curse 6/10 — B rate horror flick, mildly amusing albeit a bit slow in the middle. Interesting little twist at the end.

:y:


Fave film of the year so far

X-Men Origins: Wolverine: 5/10

:(

Just checked and people ar eliking this Wolverine movie? Wow. Dunno why.

Lol I know. I'm with you Des. It was beyond awful to me. I think critics and movie geeks seem to agree with us, while the general public and fanboys will stand for it.
That isn't suprising though, since the latter just want to see mutants, and the former want to see explosions, cliches, and good looking people.

Wolverine, 4/10. I'm no big superhero movie fan but that was a bit crap.

Star Trek 10/10

Hopefully the beginning of something special.

Come on

Star Trek 4.5/5

Star Trek - Hmmm....10/10. I saw nothing wrong with it.

Are you out of your Vulkin mind?

*Vulcan

Are you all sci fi nerds ( in the nicest way :$ ) that liked Star Trek so much or is it a good film?

Watchmen 10/10. First time I ever walked out of a film with no complaints. Saw it again in IMAX, even fucking better.

Star Trek 9.5/10

I have never seen anything Star Trek related until this movie, and I loved it.

The Soloist - 3.5/5

Kill Switch 1/10

God damn it , I`m pretty sure Steven Seagal has been dead since Above the Law. I give a point to him for making me laugh when he bangs chicks still wearing long sleeves.

I never watched Star Trek before I seen the movie and I thought the movie was outstanding.

Kill Bill Vol. 2 - 5/10.

Some of the parts skipped due to library rental. My main problem with this was that it had alot of useless dialogue. It wasn't boring or anything, it just went a ilttle overboard in blahblahblahborkdaborkdeebork.

That's pretty much the case in every Quentin Tarantino movie.

Burn After Reading 6.5/10

Confusing.

If you tried to follow the plot you missed the point

That film was hilarious...went to see it with my wife at the cinema...she's quite prude in public places and her face when Clooney unveiled the dildo seat thing was classic...I was laughing so hard...she was embarassed by it and slid down into her seat making me laugh harder

The Pelican Brief 7/10

The dildo part was great.

Star Trek 7.5/10

Journey to the Center of the Earth 6/10

The Brendan Fraiser flick.

Wouldn't you want to underline great? lol, unless you're implying the part used to be great but no longer is?

Dazed and Confused 9/10

This movie is awesome. The acting is great, all the mannerisms and such really capture the period.

Yes Man 7.5/10

Liked that it wasn't a complete Liar Liar Ripoff and it had some funny moments. Plus Zooey Deschanel is in it, which is always a plus.

JCVD 3/5

The Uninvited.

8.5/10. Wow, totally had me. loved the end of this movie. I recomend picking it up if you have an hour and a half to spare

Star Trek 9/10

Awesome. First timers and geeks alike seem to be enjoying:y:

Deja Vu - 7/10. I thought it would have been better if (highlight) Denzel dies at the end and DOESNT come back

Oceans Eleven - 9/10

Ghostbusters - 6/10. Finally saw this and it was good.....great maybe?

Anyone see Angels and Demons? Does it tie in with Da Vinci Code, cause I couldnt understand A FRIGGEN THING in that movie.

Taken 8.5/10

In certain parts it was totaly unrealistic, like while driving that car at ultra speed in the wrong lanes..there were never any cars both near each other side by side? That would have been the end of him.

Compelling action though, and I loved seeing the lousy foreigners getting the shit kicked out of them.

I don't know what I'm more upset about. The fact that someone only just saw Ghostbusters for the first time recently, or the fact that they gave it a 6/10....


Anyways:

Angels and Demons 6/10

Maybe lower.

It was just PorkSode Jeritron.

I haven't seen Angels and Demons, I haven't even seen the Da Vinci Code. I kinda hate Tom Hanks.

How could anyone hate Tom Hanks? He is incredibly lovable.

Seriously. Love Tom Hanks

The Spirit 2/5

Star Trek

8/10

Donnie Brasco - 4/5

Cars - 4/5

The girls flashing McQueen in the beginning was kinda shocking. There are two other scenes that I'm certain adults blushed at.

I saw Angels and Demons but I have not seen the Da Vinci Code. I don't really think that mattered, because I understood most of it. The story reminded me a lot of Final Fantasy Tactics which was cool. Actually really liked this movie a lot. Prolly gunna go with a 9/10 here. You had Obi Wan Kenobi goin nuts on everyone then Ivan Rodriguez takin over for all the people. Fucking hated Cars.

Curious Case of Benjamin Button - 9/10

The only slight issue I have was that it was probably 20-30 minutes too long but Im not sure where they could have cut it to get it under 2 1/2 hours. Probably the best movie Ive seen in quite a long time though. Very strong Forest Gump vibe which is somewhere on my top 10 favorite movies ever.

Boy Eats Girl 7/10 Pretty funny for an Irish B movie.

Did you pre order Boy Eats Girl on Blu Ray disc?

Star Trek 9/10. First time i have seen anything Star Trek besides when I saw one of them with Prof.X :shifty: (Patrick Stewart). I enjoyed it a lot, but Im a Star Wars guy for life and my favorite part about Star Wars is the Ship Battles and Star Trek didnt have that very epic battle. Again thats why it is a 9 outta 10 but thats what part 2 is for. I:heart:U.S.S. Enterprise :D

The Happening 11/10..... WHY??!:wtf:....... Because Marky Mark talks to a PLANT!!! Greatest Scene EVER


JKJKJKJK....That Movie Sucked BIG TIME

Taken 8.5/10

Ghostbusters? It was great....I got no complaints, I just didn't see a 10 out of 10 for it....IDK why....

Anyway....

Oceans Eleven - 10/10. Brilliant.

I Love You, Man - 7/10. I love you Bro Montana

On what scale does a 60% represent "great" other than baseball batting averages?

What the fuck is up with you? Seriously.

Spiderman 3- 8/10 Everything just felt rushed. Could have done more for sure

Underworld: Rise of the Lycans 8/10

A lot better then I thought it would be.

And yes, DrA, I watched it on Blu Ray disc.

I think I love my wife (Chris Rock Version)

Actually a lot better than I thought it would be, as I normally hate Chris Rock in movies, as he doesn’t normally act, he Just acts like Chris Rock

A solid 7.5/10 for me

Plague Town 2/5

Australia - 4/5

A trilogy of movies in one go!

Angels & Demons - 8/10

Quarantine - 7/10

Angels & Demons - 3.5/5

Assassin's Creed 2 team should watch this and grab some pointers.

Game 6

3/10

Pretty bad movie

Redeeming quality was the baseball aspect

Stop rating movies on a scale from 1-5

You can rate them however you want Assfag.

Star Trek - 8.5/10

Red Cliff pt. 1 - 5/5

Words cannot describe.....

Watchmen - 4/5

As it turns out, I watch the Watchmen!

Would you go as far as to say you can rate them however you want Assfag

I saw Knowing a few weeks ago. Man that shit was funny. 3/10

Watched Da Vinci Code last night. IT was too long, Audrey Tautou was stiff, and Hanks mailed it in. 4/10.

Yes I would sir.

Terminator Salvation

It deserves a 5/10, but I'll give it a 6.5/10 cuz I've loved Cameron's films since I could talk.

Feel free to round that up to a 7 if you need to.

Why would past films have a bearing on a current rating? And what elements accounted for that .5? The filter?

Because it's a fourth sequel?

Lets be honest, when they're trying their hardest to poke you on the shoulder and say "Hey this is a T2 sequel in case you didn't know", it matters. The movie itself was a 5/10.

The only enjoyment I got out of it were moments like Arnold's cameo, or the Guns N Roses song, or catchphrase lines like "Come with me if you want to live" and "I'll be back"

That's why the past movies have bearing on it. Those moments are only cashing in off the viewers previous memories. They're not offering anything new. It's a nostalgia moment. It doesn't make the film good, it just makes you smile a little bit based on the other films.
So yea, that's why that stuff matters. Don't try to act like there isn't an interextual criteria present. The whole gimmick of the movie is that it's a sanctioned predecessor of T2, and the 30 seconds sum total of the movie that is quality is clinging to that.

So yes, I enjoyed some of it. It was a pretty bad movie, but is elevated to just mediocre because of a few moments. They don't make it a good film. I'd enjoy them just as much in a video game. Get it?

I give .5's because I think there needs to be a grey area between a 6 and a 7. I mean seriously, you're judging a movie. There are degrees.

There's a difference between an 85 score on a test, and an 80 score. This movie gets a 65. That's passing. A 6 wouldn't be.

So why not just... give it a seven? You can argue degrees, but you really don't know what accounts for that .5 do you? It just seems like a precise score. If you gave it a six or seven I would have imagined your feelings just the same. This isn't a crack against you, I just find the whole 'point-anything' score pretentious. X out of five is much more direct, IMO.

I didn't see the movie, but I'm willing to bet you liked more than 30 seconds. That's not a bit harsh to you?

I meant 30 seconds of T2 nostalgia. The action was great too, but whats action when it doesn't serve a great story, and you don't care about the characters engaging in it? It's nothing, and it makes it a living video game for 13 year olds...hence the PG13 rating

. I don't know how much the enjoyable elements added up to. It was a quip.

The plot (if there was one) and the characters were fairly awful.
I gave a breakdown of how I felt about the movie in the other thread.

How is the point any less direct? It's just a decimal to give it an extra half point. Like I said, it's like a test score.
A 6.5 is passing. A 6 is not. I gave it a 6.5 because I found it to be inbetween. It wasn't a fail, but it wasn't a good movie.
A 7 would be a good, but not great movie.

6 is mediocre
7 is good
8 is very good
9 is amazing
10 is a masterpeice

I felt it was somewhere between "okay" and "mediocre"

At the core, though, it's a pretty bad movie. Once you strip away the Terminator bells and whistles.

I was joking about the round up to 7 thing. It was for people who would have a problem with my low rating. It was a joke aimed at this type of shit.

Your score system makes 1 through 5 pointless, though. Why don't you just take your 6 through 10 and make it 1 through 5?

It doesn't make 1-5 pointless. I said 6 was mediocre.

1-5 would be degrees of bad. How is that pointless? If you are under .500 on a score, you are bad. There are different degrees to rate how badly you fail.

Why must you play devils advocate on all things fanboy? I don't see you questioning my Angels and Demons rating, or my In Bruges score.
It's because it's Terminator and I'm not sure why you're compelled to speak up on the behalf of any negative aura surrounding these things. Sometimes these movies suck. It's okay.

6.5/10 ----mediocre.

The truth is rating systems are all flawed. It's a measurement to gauge an intangible thing. I'm giving it extra degrees to make it less flawed.

The substance of my rating would be in the explanation given for why I did or didn't think it was a good movie, which I did.
See that.

I have to address your frequent comparisons to test scores.

If I get a 65 in a test, my teacher could show me exactly what accounted for that 5 points that put me between a 60 and a 70. Tests use strict systems that take correctness/errors into account. Now unless you're gonna tell me you broke down the movie into elements that were correct or erroneous, that led to such a precise score of 6.5, it's a bad comparison. This is my issue with any score system that does this. It's like straddling the fence. A test score isn't straddling the fence because there are tangible, exact evidence that constitutes an exact score.

3/5 is mediocre.

And with you using a scale of ten, you already have enough degrees to work with, no?

You're gonna tell me you can account for any tangibles exactly with other numbers? What real difference does it make? At what point does it become pretentious.

Me and others have been using a 10 point scale with decimals for this entire thread. Suddenly it's a problem with Terminator?

It's because thats where I'd place the movie numerically. It's not an exact score. I'm not using a decimal point like .432 or something.
It's a .5. By that I mean half. A half a star.
Just because it's a decimal doesn't mean I'm being a mathematic stickler.

I've voiced my feelings on the matter in the past - I'm not in Terminator's pocket or anything. It just happens to be you I'm addressing. Don't feel persecuted, feel chosen.

And I don't like half-a-stars either. Gay.

I myself used the 10 scale for a time.

I award partial credit

You ever gave a full .5 to anything?

I would give Lady in the Water a .5/10

The .5's probably for the credit sequence. Something like the points you get on SATs for getting your name right.

I just use the Netflix system. 1 Star = Hated it, 2 = Didn't Like it, 3 = Liked it, 4 = Really liked it, 5 = Loved it.

However there are some movies I feel fall between these where I throw in the .5. To me a 5/5 would pretty much be a perfect movie which I don't really encounter often. I really really liked Star Trek but didn't LOVE it/think it was perfect so I gave it 4.5/5