TPWW Forums

TPWW Forums (https://www.tpwwforums.com/index.php)
-   wrestling forum (https://www.tpwwforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   Crown Jewel / Saudi Arabia (https://www.tpwwforums.com/showthread.php?t=135529)

Destor 10-30-2018 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Destor (Post 5190573)
Not exclusively but it cant be dismissed. The press being an unelected oligarchy is a real problem and Trump capitalized on it.

I think it was Spirow Agnew first noted this in 69. Its been a swelling thats been left unattended too long. Regans removal of propaganda protections sped things up 10 fold.

Swiss Ultimate 10-30-2018 04:22 PM

I'm on Team Jericho in this.

slik 10-30-2018 08:23 PM

Pro Wrestling Sheet reporting Renee Young will do commentary for the show...


<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Excited to see <a href="https://twitter.com/ReneeYoungWWE?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@ReneeYoungWWE</a> on commentary for <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/WWECrownJewel?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#WWECrownJewel</a>. <a href="https://t.co/mzQrtKN23u">pic.twitter.com/mzQrtKN23u</a></p>&mdash; Brad Shepard (@TheBradShepard) <a href="https://twitter.com/TheBradShepard/status/1057424962661834753?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 31, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

slik 10-30-2018 08:23 PM

Also, DBry vs AJ is happening on SDLive r/n

Seanny One Ball 10-30-2018 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Big Vic (Post 5185690)
Do you think Boxing and UFC is homoerotic too?

They fight for a purse

Destor 10-30-2018 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Slik (Post 5190655)
Pro Wrestling Sheet reporting Renee Young will do commentary for the show...


<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Excited to see <a href="https://twitter.com/ReneeYoungWWE?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@ReneeYoungWWE</a> on commentary for <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/WWECrownJewel?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#WWECrownJewel</a>. <a href="https://t.co/mzQrtKN23u">pic.twitter.com/mzQrtKN23u</a></p>&mdash; Brad Shepard (@TheBradShepard) <a href="https://twitter.com/TheBradShepard/status/1057424962661834753?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 31, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

This joke would have more teeth if they hadnt booked women in the past year

RP 10-30-2018 09:24 PM


Swiss Ultimate 10-30-2018 09:27 PM

NSFW: show
Quote:

Originally Posted by RP (Post 5190717)


Hide that before Noid goes into a fit of white rage.

Simple Fan 10-31-2018 01:09 AM

Looking forward to this show even more now that it's AJ vs Joe. No secret I'm not a Daniel Bryan fan and I enjoyed the symbolism of having him tap out on TV.

xrodmuc316 10-31-2018 02:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Dastardly One (Post 5190569)
That's not why Trump got elected. It certainly didn't help but it's largely an overarching narrative that is given far too much weight. From my novice understanding, people tend to turn to populist, brutish candidates during times of economic distress.

While "The Left" fails in their inability to understand and communicate with blue collar folk (such as simple fan for instance), there could have been a chance with Bernie Sanders. But with Hilary Clinton, you had a smug, charisma vacuum who was such a bad candidate she didn't even do rallies during her campaign.

"The Left" has always been holier than thou thinly veiled racists (like Noid) who can't deal with their own white guilt and yet they've held power plenty of times. There's many more factors that got Donald Trump elected beyond the likes of Jon Oliver and virtue signallers on Twitter.

Bernie Sanders would have won easily, but democrats wanted to show how progressive they are by getting they first woman elected president.

Problem is like you said, they picked a very unlikable untrustworthy woman because they just assumed they would win. It shows how full of their delusions they were by how shocked they were when Trump won.

Even if I agree with a lot of the Democratic party points of view, I could never call myself a liberal because I just can't argue points the way liberals do. They take everything way too far.

Pit barrel made a post in the other subforum, sarcastically I assume, about banning all white privilege and that completely illustrates the point. Being upset at people for not being tolerant of everybody, so let's get rid of them because I don't want to tolerate them.

Just say if somebody is being racist they should be banned. Don't make it about them being "white privileged" cause that is disliking them based on their race.

That just doesn't make the argument in any kind of logical way, and sadly many liberals spew just as much hate as any other racist.

Swiss Ultimate 10-31-2018 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xrodmuc316 (Post 5190863)
Bernie Sanders would have won easily, but democrats wanted to show how progressive they are by getting they first woman elected president.

Problem is like you said, they picked a very unlikable untrustworthy woman because they just assumed they would win. It shows how full of their delusions they were by how shocked they were when Trump won.

Even if I agree with a lot of the Democratic party points of view, I could never call myself a liberal because I just can't argue points the way liberals do. They take everything way too far.

Pit barrel made a post in the other subforum, sarcastically I assume, about banning all white privilege and that completely illustrates the point. Being upset at people for not being tolerant of everybody, so let's get rid of them because I don't want to tolerate them.

Just say if somebody is being racist they should be banned. Don't make it about them being "white privileged" cause that is disliking them based on their race.

That just doesn't make the argument in any kind of logical way, and sadly many liberals spew just as much hate as any other racist.

Yeah, I was being sarcastic.

Ol Dirty Dastard 10-31-2018 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xrodmuc316 (Post 5190863)
Bernie Sanders would have won easily, but democrats wanted to show how progressive they are by getting they first woman elected president.

Problem is like you said, they picked a very unlikable untrustworthy woman because they just assumed they would win. It shows how full of their delusions they were by how shocked they were when Trump won.

Even if I agree with a lot of the Democratic party points of view, I could never call myself a liberal because I just can't argue points the way liberals do. They take everything way too far.

Pit barrel made a post in the other subforum, sarcastically I assume, about banning all white privilege and that completely illustrates the point. Being upset at people for not being tolerant of everybody, so let's get rid of them because I don't want to tolerate them.

Just say if somebody is being racist they should be banned. Don't make it about them being "white privileged" cause that is disliking them based on their race.

That just doesn't make the argument in any kind of logical way, and sadly many liberals spew just as much hate as any other racist.

We're in the same boat but I also can't stand far right snowflakes either because they hold liberals to some ridiculous standard. "I'm allowed to be an asshole, but if this liberal left leaning person displays anything off base, they are garbage".

Swiss Ultimate 10-31-2018 10:08 AM

Everybody uses "snowflake" wrong. It's not people who can't take criticism or are outraged by everything, it's supposed to be people who think they're special "unique snowflakes" and their shit don't stink.

Most of us are various levels of scum. I'm pond scum for instance.

Big Vic 10-31-2018 10:11 AM

Dave was being 'ironic' or something

Ol Dirty Dastard 10-31-2018 10:26 AM

Big Vic was being a dumbfuck "or something" as usual.

I'm aware of the "unique snowflake", but it's used to describe someone easily triggered and it's a commonly accepted application of the word. Thanks for the condescending lesson though, Swiss.

Destor 10-31-2018 10:40 AM

its def used wrong but at this point its used wrong so much that the wrong definition is the definition now.

Ol Dirty Dastard 10-31-2018 10:43 AM

I'm sure this is common with many terms.

Swiss Ultimate 10-31-2018 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Dastardly One (Post 5190923)
I'm sure this is common with many terms.

Like Tub-Stumper and Whoopie cushion.

Big Vic 10-31-2018 11:04 AM

I like how they had to change the definition of 'literally'

Ol Dirty Dastard 10-31-2018 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by <b>Google</b>

<b>lit·er·al·ly</b>
/ˈlidərəlē,ˈlitrəlē/

<i>adverb</i>
in a literal manner or sense; exactly.
"the driver took it literally when asked to go straight across the traffic circle"
synonyms: exactly, precisely, actually, really, truly; More

<b>INFORMAL</b>
used for emphasis or to express strong feeling while not being literally true.
"Big Vic is literally the biggest doofus I have ever met"

#1-norm-fan 10-31-2018 11:14 AM

I love Cena even more now for fucking over WWE. Bryan, too. But his absence doesn’t leave nearly the mark Cena’s does.

Droford 10-31-2018 11:41 AM

How does Cena opting out of going screw over WWE more than Bryan? Cena hasnt worked a non overseas show since WM but he had been to SA for the Greatest Royal Rumble

Big Vic 10-31-2018 11:44 AM

Attacking me because I commented on the definition of literally? Ok Dale I'm going to wipe my hands now and leave you and your glass house alone.

Destor 10-31-2018 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Droford (Post 5190945)
How does Cena opting out of going screw over WWE more than Bryan? Cena hasnt worked a non overseas show since WM but he had been to SA for the Greatest Royal Rumble

Surely you recognize that Cena is the most valuable act in the company yeah?

Ol Dirty Dastard 10-31-2018 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Big Vic (Post 5190947)
Attacking me because I commented on the definition of literally? Ok Dale I'm going to wipe my hands now and leave you and your glass house alone.

lol i was busting your balls

Destor 10-31-2018 11:48 AM

wait was Vic not busting yours just then?

Ol Dirty Dastard 10-31-2018 11:49 AM

i dont know anymore

Ol Dirty Dastard 10-31-2018 11:49 AM

:'(

Swiss Ultimate 10-31-2018 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Dastardly One (Post 5190951)
i dont know anymore

People have been coming to me and saying that you've been bullying them on here, Dale. They say they no longer like being here because of your behavior.

Just something to think about.

Ol Dirty Dastard 10-31-2018 12:41 PM

Couldn't be true. It's well known that I am, in fact, TPWW's moral compass.

Swiss Ultimate 10-31-2018 12:43 PM

Yes, but you're not a paragon of virtue like myself. You're just a big hunk.

Swiss Ultimate 10-31-2018 12:44 PM

They says to me, "That Dale fella is sure the moral compass of TPWW all right, wherever'n he's pointed, you'd best head d'other direcktion."

#1-norm-fan 10-31-2018 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Droford (Post 5190945)
How does Cena opting out of going screw over WWE more than Bryan? Cena hasnt worked a non overseas show since WM but he had been to SA for the Greatest Royal Rumble

Quote:

Originally Posted by Destor (Post 5190948)
Surely you recognize that Cena is the most valuable act in the company yeah?

And specifically WAY more valuable to the people paying WWE millions for the show. I’m pretty sure they could take or leave Bryan. John Cena not being there hurts.

#1-norm-fan 10-31-2018 12:54 PM

Plus now they’ve gotta have the other biggest star Brock Lesnar do the post match speech thanking the fine people of Saudi Arabia. Gonna be awkward.

xrodmuc316 10-31-2018 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by #1-wwf-fan (Post 5190937)
I love Cena even more now for fucking over WWE. Bryan, too. But his absence doesn’t leave nearly the mark Cena’s does.

I would be especially pleased if they were gonna let Bryan win the title, but because he isn't going, they let Joe win the belt instead.

xrodmuc316 10-31-2018 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Dastardly One (Post 5190911)
We're in the same boat but I also can't stand far right snowflakes either because they hold liberals to some ridiculous standard. "I'm allowed to be an asshole, but if this liberal left leaning person displays anything off base, they are garbage".

Agreed, anybody that isn't open to debate falls right into the same category. The far right is less whiny, but they are also less compassionate.

The far right thinks either agree with me or you don't matter and aren't worth any time.
The far left thinks either agree with me or I'll stomp my feet and yell at you for hours.

Ol Dirty Dastard 10-31-2018 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xrodmuc316 (Post 5191003)
Agreed, anybody that isn't open to debate falls right into the same category. The far right is less whiny, but they are also less compassionate.

That is until someone gets fired for saying something stupid (re: racist), and then they're whining like a bunch of little bitches about "free speech" even though free speech has nothing to do with employment.

Swiss Ultimate 10-31-2018 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xrodmuc316 (Post 5191003)
Agreed, anybody that isn't open to debate falls right into the same category. The far right is less whiny, but they are also less compassionate.

HEY ASSHOLE, I AM NOT LESS WHINY.

Sepholio 10-31-2018 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xrodmuc316 (Post 5191003)
Agreed, anybody that isn't open to debate falls right into the same category. The far right is less whiny, but they are also less compassionate.

LOL. He says the people that will cry about a paper coffee cup not saying merry Christmas are less whiny.

Ol Dirty Dastard 10-31-2018 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seph (Post 5191033)
LOL. He says the people that will cry about a paper coffee cup not saying merry Christmas are less whiny.

:y::y::y::y:


THE WAR ON CHRISTMAS


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:14 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®